We use cookies to improve your browsing experience, provide personalized content, analyze website traffic, and deliver targeted advertisements. Some cookies are essential for the proper functioning of our website, while others help us improve your experience or provide analytics.
- By clicking "Accept All", you consent to the use of all cookies.
- If you are in California or certain other U.S. states, you can opt out of the "sale" or sharing of your personal data by clicking "Do Not Sell or Share My Information".
- For more details, please read our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.
This week marked the first week of late flower for both Blueberry plants. By this point, bud weight had increased significantly, and I had to add structural support to every branch of Blueberry #1 - similar to what I did for Blueberry #2 back in Week 9.
Feeding continued a few times per week, but at a much lower strength than in mid-flower. I aimed to maintain EC levels in a healthy range, keeping nutrient concentrations between 800–1,000 ppm to support ripening without overloading the medium.
Mid-week, I performed a detailed trichome inspection to assess maturity. I took 2–3 macro images of each branch set, calculated the trichome distribution for each node, and used a weighted average to get a clear picture of overall progression for both plants. The results showed that both Blueberry plants were maturing at a similar rate, with an average trichome profile of 30% clear, 65% cloudy, and 5% amber. Individually,
By this stage, I had tapered UV-A exposure from its peak of 2 hours per day in mid-flower down to 60 minutes daily. I held steady at that duration throughout Week 11. Light intensity remained high across the canopy to keep pushing the sativa-leaning Stardawg, which continued to trail the Blueberry plants by a couple of weeks in terms of maturity.